Structured review
Role criteria, screening, and notes stay in one shared workflow.
Structure roles, review candidates, explain shortlists, and keep every decision traceable. AI supports your workflow with scoring and analysis, while recruiters remain accountable for final hiring outcomes.
Why HanteR works
Role criteria, screening, and notes stay in one shared workflow.
Scoring context and shortlist rationale are visible before decisions.
Teams decide outcomes while AI supports analysis and prioritization.
Evidence, salary guidance, and decision history stay traceable.
How teams decide with HanteR
01
Define role
Set expectations and process stages.
02
Review evidence
Compare structured profiles and scoring.
03
Decide with traceability
Record notes and final rationale in context.
Recruitment Workspace Preview
Shortlisted
3 candidates
Open role
Senior Product Manager
Activity
Updated 8 min ago
Alexandra N.
Score 88Strong strategic and delivery evidence for this stage; move forward to hiring manager panel.
Audit note: Score increased after tenure and product-scope evidence review.
Dimitris P.
Score 79Solid execution profile; shortlist with follow-up on ownership depth.
Audit note: Role-alignment points adjusted after screening response validation.
Maria L.
Score 71Potential for role progression, pending screening completion.
Audit note: Awaiting final screening submission before a final shortlist decision.
Annual range
€68,000 - €84,000
Range reflects role scope, market, and company context signals.
Why HanteR
HanteR solves review fragmentation by connecting role context, candidate evidence, and recruiter decisions in one structured flow.
Replace scattered docs, inbox threads, and spreadsheets with one recruiter-controlled review workspace.
Use templates, screening, and score context so hiring decisions are based on the same structured criteria.
Track evidence, notes, and shortlist rationale so every hiring outcome has a clear decision trail.
Product pillars
From role setup to audit history, each pillar supports repeatable, reviewable hiring decisions.
Organise each role with stages, process settings, and role context so recruiting work happens in one place.
Turn CVs and application data into structured candidate profiles that are easier to compare and review.
Review deterministic score breakdowns, evidence summaries, and shortlist explanations before advancing anyone.
Run structured screening flows and reusable templates to keep evaluation standards consistent across roles.
Capture notes, align hiring managers, and compare candidates with shared context instead of scattered messages.
Use role-aware compensation signals to support offer planning alongside candidate evaluation.
Keep a clear trail of scoring inputs, reviewer notes, and process activity for internal review and reporting.
Built for recruitment teams
Use HanteR across role kickoff, candidate review, and final decision handoff without context switching.
Set role context before applications start.
Evaluate candidates with shared context, not gut feel.
Move from shortlist to decision with traceability.
How HanteR helps recruiters decide
HanteR assists with structure and evidence. Recruiters review context, make tradeoffs, and own final decisions.
Start from your own role definition, an imported role, or a template and set the hiring process structure.
Bring in candidates through your application flow or direct uploads from your existing recruiting process.
HanteR extracts and organises candidate evidence so each profile can be reviewed against role expectations.
Use scoring breakdowns, screening outcomes, and collaboration notes to compare candidates with clear context.
HanteR supports the review process, while recruiters and hiring teams remain responsible for final decisions.
Decision layers
Role fit, skills evidence, screening outcomes, salary guidance, notes, and audit history work together instead of living in separate tools.
Match role scope, seniority, and expectations against candidate profile signals.
Map explicit skills, inferred strengths, and supporting experience evidence.
Use standardized questions and template-driven evaluation to reduce review variance.
Combine score breakdowns, shortlist explanations, and salary guidance in one view.
Keep recruiter and hiring manager notes close to candidate evidence and stages.
Store structured actions, rationale, and process history for quality and governance reviews.
From role to decision
Move quickly from role creation to recruiter-led final decisions with clear checkpoints.
Set criteria, process stages, and screening structure.
Bring candidate inputs into comparable profile evidence.
Assess fit, score context, screening results, and notes.
Share shortlist rationale with hiring managers in context.
Confirm outcome with a traceable decision history.
Pricing
Pick your entry point here, then compare full plan details on the pricing page.
€0 / month
€19 / month
Custom pricing
Built by GenAIze for hiring teams in every sector
Create your first role process, align reviewers, and keep every scoring and shortlist decision reviewable from one place.